Sunday, May 17, 2015

Neuroscience + Art

              

 With this week’s topic on neuroscience and art, I will be focusing on “memory”. Both neuroscience and art focuses a lot on the idea of memory and how individuals not only interpret their memory, but how often are memories kept.

                The study of neuroscience looks at the psychological and physical development of the brain itself. Art and neuroscience work hand in hand both on the psychological aspect spilling over to a physical relationship. Both art and neuroscience touch upon the idea of an individual’s consciousness, and what it means for an individual to be conscious or unconscious. For the purpose of this blog and memory, we will be gearing toward the conscious memory of an individual when dealing with the relationship between neuroscience and art.


                Neuroscience looks at the anatomical and behavioral nature of an individual’s memory so as long the memory is kept. Art in the other hand interprets an individual’s memory and uses that with core objectives for the art piece. In 1959, C.P. snow indicated that there were now two cultures in the educated world, the scientific and the artistic which is separated by mutual incomprehension. Artists not understanding scientists, and vice versa. (Vesna, Week 7)
           When it comes to one’s memory, both art and neuroscience understand that memory is faulty and continuously changing. Discoveries from both neurologists and artists see that when one’s perception of a memory first rejects something as ugly, it later perceives as beautiful, which underlines patterns that have yet to be recognized in both fields.                   
            The combination of artistic theories with hard data from neurologists is needed to see “memories” in a new light. When one thinks of how a memory came to be, one can either think of the scientific reasoning with the gustatory and olfactory nerves or one will lean toward a theoretical understanding and catalog of perceptions. What really helped during this week’s blog was that both the field of art and neuroscience are needed to comprehend how every memory is significant. No matter the experience or feeling caused by it. For a memory is only as real as the last time you remember it. (Lehrer 20)


Citations
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vesna,V Desma 9 Video Lecture Week 7

Max, D. T. "Swann's Hypothesis", 2004. Page 1-3 

Lehrer, John, "Misreading the Mind", 2007, Page 15-17

Lee, Hesnok, "Brain Damage and Consciousness", 2005 Page 20-21


No comments:

Post a Comment